The masthead

Editorial standards and corrections

A ranking site published by a company that operates one of the ranked products has one defensible posture: rules stated in advance, applied in public, with a permanent record when it gets something wrong. This page is that posture, written down.

What we publish, and what we refuse to

Every factual claim on this site is sourced to a document we opened ourselves: official rules, store listings and their purchase declarations, operator pages, court and regulator records, archived copies, and dated user reviews. Every listing names its sources with retrieval dates. We do not fabricate statistics, prize amounts, user counts, quotes, or ratings; if a figure is not in a source we opened, we omit it, and when a source is thin the score falls. Marketing claims are labeled as marketing. Self-published operator figures are labeled self-published, including our publisher's own.

How scoring works

The rubric is public: 100 points across free-entry purity (30), rules transparency (20), prize credibility (20), operator track record (15), and entry experience (15), with a letter grade capped by documented regulatory history. The About page defines the axes and the exclusion policy; the grade rationale page itemizes where every point came off, for every listing. Apps that fail the bar are not quietly omitted; they are documented by name, with evidence, on the reviewed-not-ranked page.

The conflict of interest, handled in the open

SweepstakeReport is published by Luck Incorporated LLC, which operates Chance Infinite, currently ranked first. We do not pretend that away; we constrain it. The house product is scored on the same rubric as every competitor, its deductions are itemized in the same public ledger, competitors' wins over it on individual axes are stated in our own copy (four ranked apps outscore it on at least one axis today), and its listing tells you to verify every claim against the sources it cites. Ownership is disclosed on every page of this site. No operator, including our publisher, can buy a grade, and the rubric did not spare the house product at launch: the first edition shipped with Chance Infinite ranked fourth, behind three legacy competitors, a placement preserved in the archived edition.

The masthead is one person: Kyle Lewis, the founder of the publisher. Bylines on this site name him because responsibility should have a name attached; the editor page states his role, his stake, and how this desk works.

Verification before publication

Before major publications, claims are adversarially checked against their sources by reviewers whose instruction is to refute, not to confirm. The launch edition had 1,309 claims verified this way; the apps-only edition's pages were checked the same way before deployment, and the process caught and fixed real errors in both, including errors that favored the house product and errors that disfavored competitors. Verification is not a guarantee of perfection; it is why the corrections log below is short.

Corrections policy

When a published claim turns out to be wrong, we correct it in place with a dated, visible marker, and record it below permanently. We do not silently rewrite. Two categories are distinguished: a correction withdraws a claim that was wrong when published; an update notes that the world changed after publication (a store listing changed, an app went down, a window closed). Updates are dated in place; corrections are dated in place and logged here, and significant updates may also be noted in the log, labeled as updates, for the record.

The corrections log

Standing re-review commitments

Exclusions and low scores are not verdicts for eternity; they are verdicts on the evidence as of the research date, and we have written down what would change each one: PCH's apps get rescored when they demonstrably work again; Robin gets a full review if its rules return to a live URL; WYN, Play To Win, and SpinToWin become rankable if they sever the paid path into entries (and, for SpinToWin, drop its prize-transfer and maintenance fees); Vast becomes reviewable if it publishes a standing first-party program. The exclusion commitments appear on the exclusions page; the PCH rescore commitment is stated in the PCH reviews themselves, since those apps are ranked rather than excluded. We consider ourselves bound by all of them.

Challenges

If you can show that a claim on this site does not match the source it cites, or that a cited source has changed, we want to know, and the fix will be dated and logged. The publisher is Luck Incorporated LLC; current contact routes are listed on luckincorporated.com. Challenges to the house product's listing get no gentler treatment than challenges to any competitor's; if anything, they get less.